Wednesday June 19, 2013

QUESTION OF THE WEEK

  • Forest fires are a fact of life in Northern Manitoba, although the number and severity vary year to year. How prepared do you feel you are to evacuate quickly if the need arose under a disaster management plan scenario?
  • Poorly prepared. I’d be running around like a chicken with its head cut off. I know better but I’m complacent
  • 87%
  • Well prepared. I keep current with Canadian Red Cross evacuation tips at: http://www.redcross.ca/article.asp?id
  • 13%
  • Total Votes: 128



N.S. to allow easements to keep land in farming

Community groups will now be able to pay farmers or other landowners in Nova Scotia to keep a given piece of land in agricultural or other "traditional" uses.

The province on Thursday proposed new legislation broadening the use of easements, a tool already enshrined in the province's Conservation Easements Act to protect land with particular ecological or heritage value.

The new Community Easements Act proposed Thursday would also allow a group to use an easement to keep land in specific "traditional and economic uses," even if the land is sold.

A landowner would then get financial compensation from the group for agreeing to the easement, the province said.

Such easements could then be used to keep land in agricultural use, or to retain "community access" to the land, or to preserve certain views, "working forests," wetlands, woodlots, archaeological sites or lands of "cultural importance."

"This act helps preserve access to private lands being used by the community, which is a commitment we made to Nova Scotians," provincial Natural Resources Minister Charlie Parker said in a release. "Land access is very important to people across the province, especially those in rural areas."

The proposed legislation would allow a community easement to run for a "stated period" or in perpetuity. It also makes clear that a group holding an easement and using or occupying the land covered by the easement will not have any "possessory or prescriptive title" to the property.

The legislation would also make clear that a landowner won't be held liable for any breaches of the easement that take place after he or she no longer owns the land.

If a body holding an easement on given land ceases to exist, the province could name another group to hold the easement. Failing that, the province could then opt to either terminate the easement or hold the easement itself.

The province on Thursday also proposed to amend its Conservation Easements Act to clarify that conservation easements, specifically, are "to protect biodiversity and natural processes."


Comments


NOTE: To post a comment in the new commenting system you must have an account with at least one of the following services: Disqus, Facebook, Twitter, Yahoo, OpenID. You may then login using your account credentials for that service. If you do not already have an account you may register a new profile with Disqus by first clicking the "Post as" button and then the link: "Don't have one? Register a new profile".

The Thompson Citizen welcomes your opinions and comments. We do not allow personal attacks, offensive language or unsubstantiated allegations. We reserve the right to edit comments for length, style, legality and taste and reproduce them in print, electronic or otherwise. For further information, please contact the editor or publisher, or see our Terms and Conditions.

blog comments powered by Disqus


About Us | Contact Us | Advertisers | Sitemap / RSS   Glacier Community Media: www.glaciermedia.ca    © Copyright 2013 Glacier Community Media | User Agreement & Privacy Policy

LOG IN



Lost your password?